<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CALIFORNIA + IKEA BAN 100 WATT BULBS &#8211;&gt; Potential savings: $35.6 million in electricity and 10.5 million incandescent bulbs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socalmultiunitrealestateblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socalmultiunitrealestateblog.com/?p=1026</link>
	<description>Buy, sell + exchange apartment buildings + multiunits in Los Angeles + Southern California.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 03:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lighthouse</title>
		<link>http://www.socalmultiunitrealestateblog.com/?p=1026#comment-158717</link>
		<dc:creator>lighthouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 20:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalmultiunitrealestateblog.com/?p=1026#comment-158717</guid>
		<description>Hmm Jodi,
I am all for not wasting energy,
but that light bulb ban makes no sense.

There are referenced reasons why those supposed savings don&#039;t hold up, either for consumers or society, with only 1-2% grid electricity is saved 
(Dept of Energy etc data)
http://ceolas.net/#li171x
with better alternatives

Even if saving electricity, consumers hardly save money:
In assuming that people use less electricity,  California electricity utility companies are raising charges (and are being allowed to do so by regulators) giving bigger electricity bills, or are alternatively receiving subsidies with taxpayer money.
See the California CFL programs
http://ceolas.net/#californiacfl

No longer should it be seen as surprising that electricity companies happily dole out fluorescent bulbs, that are supposed to reduce their income!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm Jodi,<br />
I am all for not wasting energy,<br />
but that light bulb ban makes no sense.</p>
<p>There are referenced reasons why those supposed savings don&#8217;t hold up, either for consumers or society, with only 1-2% grid electricity is saved<br />
(Dept of Energy etc data)<br />
<a href="http://ceolas.net/#li171x" rel="nofollow">http://ceolas.net/#li171x</a><br />
with better alternatives</p>
<p>Even if saving electricity, consumers hardly save money:<br />
In assuming that people use less electricity,  California electricity utility companies are raising charges (and are being allowed to do so by regulators) giving bigger electricity bills, or are alternatively receiving subsidies with taxpayer money.<br />
See the California CFL programs<br />
<a href="http://ceolas.net/#californiacfl" rel="nofollow">http://ceolas.net/#californiacfl</a></p>
<p>No longer should it be seen as surprising that electricity companies happily dole out fluorescent bulbs, that are supposed to reduce their income!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Popular Mechanics</title>
		<link>http://www.socalmultiunitrealestateblog.com/?p=1026#comment-158716</link>
		<dc:creator>Popular Mechanics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 07:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalmultiunitrealestateblog.com/?p=1026#comment-158716</guid>
		<description>Most importantly, prices have plummeted. Quality CFLs can be purchased at nearly any hardware store for $2 or less, a premium over incandescent that can easily be paid back in saved energy costs. Over its 10,000-hour life, a $2, 14-watt CFL will burn about $15.40 worth of electricity. Over the same period, a $0.50, 60-watt incandescent would require $66 worth of power—and be replaced 10 times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most importantly, prices have plummeted. Quality CFLs can be purchased at nearly any hardware store for $2 or less, a premium over incandescent that can easily be paid back in saved energy costs. Over its 10,000-hour life, a $2, 14-watt CFL will burn about $15.40 worth of electricity. Over the same period, a $0.50, 60-watt incandescent would require $66 worth of power—and be replaced 10 times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.socalmultiunitrealestateblog.com/?p=1026#comment-158715</link>
		<dc:creator>The Guardian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 07:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalmultiunitrealestateblog.com/?p=1026#comment-158715</guid>
		<description>China has pledged to cut energy consumption per unit of GDP by 16% and cut carbon emissions by 17% in the five years to 2015.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China has pledged to cut energy consumption per unit of GDP by 16% and cut carbon emissions by 17% in the five years to 2015.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huffington Post</title>
		<link>http://www.socalmultiunitrealestateblog.com/?p=1026#comment-158714</link>
		<dc:creator>Huffington Post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 07:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalmultiunitrealestateblog.com/?p=1026#comment-158714</guid>
		<description>B.C. should defer the restrictions it’s placed on the sale of incandescent light bulbs, says the leader of the provincial Conservative Party.

John Cummins says the B.C. Liberal government has, “jumped the gun and ignored legitimate concerns,” about the more energy-efficient compact fluorescent lamp bulb, or CFL.

In a release Wednesday, Cummins said the concerns include, “poor quality lighting making reading difficult for seniors and the tendency of CFL bulbs to trigger migraines.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B.C. should defer the restrictions it’s placed on the sale of incandescent light bulbs, says the leader of the provincial Conservative Party.</p>
<p>John Cummins says the B.C. Liberal government has, “jumped the gun and ignored legitimate concerns,” about the more energy-efficient compact fluorescent lamp bulb, or CFL.</p>
<p>In a release Wednesday, Cummins said the concerns include, “poor quality lighting making reading difficult for seniors and the tendency of CFL bulbs to trigger migraines.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
